Data protection in a networked computing environment

ABSTRACT

Approaches for providing data protection in a networked computing environment are provided. A method includes detecting, by at least one computer device, a breach of a first system in the networked computing environment. The method also includes generating, by the at least one computer device, a second system in the networked computing environment, wherein the second system includes a patch based on the breach. The method additionally includes converting, by the at least one computer device, the first system to a decoy system. The method further includes generating, by the at least one computer device, a third system in the networked computing environment, wherein the third system has reduced security relative to the first system.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to data security, and moreparticularly, to data protection in a networked computing environment.

BACKGROUND

Cloud computing has become popular as organizations are discovering thatit provides a cost-effective, scalable, and flexible option to deliverbusiness or consume IT (Information Technology) services over a networkenvironment such as the Internet. Cloud computing presents unique issuesin terms of data security. A honeypot is a data security tool used tolure attackers and analyze attacker activity in computing environments.Use of honeypots in cloud environments is generally limited togeneration of additional environments, some of which are honeypots withfalsified data.

The concept of a honeypot for data security was introduced as aninformation system resource that helps to detect unauthorized use suchas malicious attacks. There are two main types of honeypots: aproduction honeypot to protect an organization, and a research honeypotto predict, monitor, and learn. Honeypots can be automaticallyprovisioned in cloud environments, and provisioned based on attackeractivity. However, these solutions have considerable drawbacks ofaffecting either valid users or attacker system usage, which limits thevalue of the honeypot. As a result, traditional automated honeypotgeneration in a cloud environment suffers from several majorlimitations. For example, in systems that create honeypots up front(e.g., multiple application environments where one environment is thetrue environment), legitimate users still need to be routed to the validenvironment. Therefore, sophisticated attackers can identify the validenvironment with relative ease, and the value of the decoy (honeypot)environments is limited mainly to non-targeted attackers that wouldstumble onto such an environment. Systems that create honeypots inresponse to an attack suffer from the same problem in the otherdirection: if a valid system is being migrated away from an exposedsystem, valid users need to be migrated to the new, valid system. Anattacker can simply monitor the valid user flow to recognize that acompromised environment has been converted into a honeypot.

SUMMARY

In a first aspect of the invention, there is a method of providing dataprotection in a networked computing environment. The method includesdetecting, by at least one computer device, a breach of a first systemin the networked computing environment. The method also includesgenerating, by the at least one computer device, a second system in thenetworked computing environment, wherein the second system includes apatch based on the breach. The method additionally includes converting,by the at least one computer device, the first system to a decoy system.The method further includes generating, by the at least one computerdevice, a third system in the networked computing environment, whereinthe third system has reduced security relative to the first system.

In another aspect of the invention there is a system for providing dataprotection in a networked computing environment. The system includes atleast one computer device in the networked computing environment,wherein the at least one computer device is configured to: detect abreach of a first production system in the networked computingenvironment; generate a second production system in the networkedcomputing environment, wherein the second production system includes apatch based on the breach; convert the first production system to adecoy system; generate a third system in the networked computingenvironment, wherein the third system includes predeterminedvulnerabilities that are patched in the first production system; andmonitor the third system for a new breach.

In another aspect of the invention there is a system for providing dataprotection. The system includes a networked computing environmentincluding: a first system comprising a first database and a first serverthat serves an application; a second system comprising a second databaseand a second server that serves the application; and a third systemcomprising a third database and a third server that serves theapplication. The second database includes valid data. The first databaseincludes a modified version of the valid data. The second systemincludes a patch based on a vulnerability detected in the first system.The third system includes the vulnerability detected in the first systemand additional predetermined vulnerabilities that are patched in thefirst system.

In another aspect of the invention, there is a computer program productfor providing data protection. The computer program product includes acomputer readable storage medium having program instructions embodiedtherewith. The program instructions are executable by a computer deviceto cause the computer device to: detect a breach of a first productionsystem in the networked computing environment; generate a secondproduction system in the networked computing environment, wherein thesecond production system includes a patch that eliminates avulnerability exposed by the breach; convert the first production systemto a decoy system by: removing high value data from a database in thefirst production system; generating decoy high value data based on lowvalue data contained in the database; and storing the decoy high valuedata in the database; generate a third system in the networked computingenvironment, wherein the third system includes: the vulnerabilityexposed by the breach and predetermined vulnerabilities that are patchedin the first production system; and monitor the third system for a newbreach that exposes a vulnerability other than the vulnerability exposedby the breach and the predetermined vulnerabilities that are patched inthe first production system.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is described in the detailed description whichfollows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way ofnon-limiting examples of exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 1 depicts a cloud computing node according to an embodiment of thepresent invention.

FIG. 2 depicts a cloud computing environment according to an embodimentof the present invention.

FIG. 3 depicts abstraction model layers according to an embodiment ofthe present invention.

FIGS. 4 and 5 depict an illustrative environment and functionality inaccordance with aspects of the invention.

FIG. 6 depicts a flow diagram of an exemplary process in accordance withaspects of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention generally relates to data security, and moreparticularly, to data protection in a networked computing environment.In accordance with aspects of the invention, prescribed actions aretaken upon discovering a breach of a production system (e.g., an attackby a hacker). These actions may include: generating a new productionsystem that includes a patch or other configuration update to mitigatethe breach; converting the breached original production system to ahoneypot (decoy) system with replicated low value data; and generating areduced security (weak) honeypot system that includes additional knownvulnerabilities. The use of low value data in the breached originalproduction system diverts the attacker's attention away from activitiesthat may lead to a breach of the patched production system. The reducedsecurity honeypot system with additional known vulnerabilities is usedto lure an attacker and then monitor the attacker's actions to discovernew (i.e., unknown) vulnerabilities that can then be patched in thepatched production system. In this manner, implementations of theinvention leave an existing exposed infrastructure intact and analyzeattacker techniques to prevent future attacks.

Aspects of the invention described herein are directed to systems andmethods that enhance techniques of automated honeypot generation. Somesolutions react to a breach by creating a new cloud infrastructure in aclean environment, or by transforming an existing system into ahoneypot. However, these solutions do not substantially alter the sourceenvironment and generated honeypots for additional intelligencegathering. Implementations of the invention may include creatinghoneypots with automatically reduced security compared to the sourceenvironment. Implementations of the invention may also include thereplication of low value data into a honeypot database to enticeattackers.

As described herein, in addition to patching newly generated,non-compromised systems with fixes that would prevent an attacker fromduplicating a previously successful attack, aspects of the inventionprovide the attacker a chance to duplicate their success in a honeypotenvironment. Security tools and forensic analysis may be used to detecta security breach of a production system, including determining theentry point of an attacker and the method(s) used in the breach. Inembodiments, based on detecting the breach, the system creates a newhoneypot environment alongside a new clean environment in order todistract and lure the attacker while the production system is patched ormigrated.

According to aspects of the invention, the newly created honeypot may befurther reduced in security compared to the original breached system.This provides a benefit of the attacker likely spreading attacks withinthe newly created honeypot system, wasting time and resources andfurther revealing data about the attacker. The attacker may also focusadditional attack resources on the perceived weaker system (i.e., thenewly created honeypot system), for example launching zero-day attacksagainst the reduced security environment that may not have been usedagainst a sufficiently hardened system. A zero-day (or zero-hour or dayzero) attack or threat is an attack that exploits a previously unknownvulnerability in a computer application or operating system, one thatdevelopers have not had time to address and patch. Implementations ofthe invention provide for luring the attacker into launching a zero-dayattack, observing and analyzing the new attack, and proactivelydeveloping and applying a patch to the production system based toeliminate a vulnerability exposed by the newly detected attack. Theseaspects may be used in a stand-alone honeypot that is physically andlogically separated from the production system. These aspects may alsobe used in hybrid honeypots that are physically and/or logicallyinterweaved with the production system, where the honeypot side of theinfrastructure has intentionally reduced security, or dynamicallyreduced security based on the user activity, to lure the attacker intoattacking the areas of least resistance.

As described herein, in addition to generating a reduced securityhoneypot, aspects of the invention generate a honeypot database that ispopulated based on valid low value data or a scrambled version of validdata from the breached original production system (as opposed tofalsified or fake data). Identification of low value data can be basedon existing security compliance classifications, such as classificationof company confidential and non-confidential data. When generating ahoneypot, the confidential data can be filtered from the source system(e.g., by leveraging a data redaction solution), and the generatedhoneypot then contains valid low value data. The data validity maycreate difficulties for an attacker, and cause the attacker to wasteresources analyzing the low value data.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thepresent invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, andconventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

It is understood in advance that although this disclosure includes adetailed description on cloud computing, implementation of the teachingsrecited herein are not limited to a cloud computing environment. Rather,embodiments of the present invention are capable of being implemented inconjunction with any other type of computing environment now known orlater developed.

Cloud computing is a model of service delivery for enabling convenient,on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computingresources (e.g. networks, network bandwidth, servers, processing,memory, storage, applications, virtual machines, and services) that canbe rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort orinteraction with a provider of the service. This cloud model may includeat least five characteristics, at least three service models, and atleast four deployment models.

Characteristics are as follows:

On-demand self-service: a cloud consumer can unilaterally provisioncomputing capabilities, such as server time and network storage, asneeded automatically without requiring human interaction with theservice's provider.

Broad network access: capabilities are available over a network andaccessed through standard mechanisms that promote use by heterogeneousthin or thick client platforms (e.g., mobile phones, laptops, and PDAs).

Resource pooling: the provider's computing resources are pooled to servemultiple consumers using a multi-tenant model, with different physicaland virtual resources dynamically assigned and reassigned according todemand. There is a sense of location independence in that the consumergenerally has no control or knowledge over the exact location of theprovided resources but may be able to specify location at a higher levelof abstraction (e.g., country, state, or datacenter).

Rapid elasticity: capabilities can be rapidly and elasticallyprovisioned, in some cases automatically, to quickly scale out andrapidly released to quickly scale in. To the consumer, the capabilitiesavailable for provisioning often appear to be unlimited and can bepurchased in any quantity at any time.

Measured service: cloud systems automatically control and optimizeresource use by leveraging a metering capability at some level ofabstraction appropriate to the type of service (e.g., storage,processing, bandwidth, and active user accounts). Resource usage can bemonitored, controlled, and reported providing transparency for both theprovider and consumer of the utilized service.

Service Models are as follows:

Software as a Service (SaaS): the capability provided to the consumer isto use the provider's applications running on a cloud infrastructure.The applications are accessible from various client devices through athin client interface such as a web browser (e.g., web-based e-mail).The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloudinfrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage,or even individual application capabilities, with the possible exceptionof limited user-specific application configuration settings.

Platform as a Service (PaaS): the capability provided to the consumer isto deploy onto the cloud infrastructure consumer-created or acquiredapplications created using programming languages and tools supported bythe provider. The consumer does not manage or control the underlyingcloud infrastructure including networks, servers, operating systems, orstorage, but has control over the deployed applications and possiblyapplication hosting environment configurations.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): the capability provided to theconsumer is to provision processing, storage, networks, and otherfundamental computing resources where the consumer is able to deploy andrun arbitrary software, which can include operating systems andapplications. The consumer does not manage or control the underlyingcloud infrastructure but has control over operating systems, storage,deployed applications, and possibly limited control of select networkingcomponents (e.g., host firewalls).

Deployment Models are as follows:

Private cloud: the cloud infrastructure is operated solely for anorganization. It may be managed by the organization or a third party andmay exist on-premises or off-premises.

Community cloud: the cloud infrastructure is shared by severalorganizations and supports a specific community that has shared concerns(e.g., mission, security requirements, policy, and complianceconsiderations). It may be managed by the organizations or a third partyand may exist on-premises or off-premises.

Public cloud: the cloud infrastructure is made available to the generalpublic or a large industry group and is owned by an organization sellingcloud services.

Hybrid cloud: the cloud infrastructure is a composition of two or moreclouds (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities butare bound together by standardized or proprietary technology thatenables data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting forload-balancing between clouds).

A cloud computing environment is service oriented with a focus onstatelessness, low coupling, modularity, and semantic interoperability.At the heart of cloud computing is an infrastructure comprising anetwork of interconnected nodes.

Referring now to FIG. 1, a schematic of an example of a cloud computingnode is shown. Cloud computing node 10 is only one example of a suitablecloud computing node and is not intended to suggest any limitation as tothe scope of use or functionality of embodiments of the inventiondescribed herein. Regardless, cloud computing node 10 is capable ofbeing implemented and/or performing any of the functionality set forthhereinabove.

In cloud computing node 10 there is a computer system/server 12, whichis operational with numerous other general purpose or special purposecomputing system environments or configurations. Examples of well-knowncomputing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may besuitable for use with computer system/server 12 include, but are notlimited to, personal computer systems, server computer systems, thinclients, thick clients, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessorsystems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmableconsumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputer systems, mainframecomputer systems, and distributed cloud computing environments thatinclude any of the above systems or devices, and the like.

Computer system/server 12 may be described in the general context ofcomputer system-executable instructions, such as program modules, beingexecuted by a computer system. Generally, program modules may includeroutines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, and soon that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract datatypes. Computer system/server 12 may be practiced in distributed cloudcomputing environments where tasks are performed by remote processingdevices that are linked through a communications network. In adistributed cloud computing environment, program modules may be locatedin both local and remote computer system storage media including memorystorage devices.

As shown in FIG. 1, computer system/server 12 in cloud computing node 10is shown in the form of a general-purpose computing device. Thecomponents of computer system/server 12 may include, but are not limitedto, one or more processors or processing units 16, a system memory 28,and a bus 18 that couples various system components including systemmemory 28 to processor 16.

Bus 18 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures,including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, anaccelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of avariety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation,such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus,Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, VideoElectronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and PeripheralComponent Interconnects (PCI) bus.

Computer system/server 12 typically includes a variety of computersystem readable media. Such media may be any available media that isaccessible by computer system/server 12, and it includes both volatileand non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

System memory 28 can include computer system readable media in the formof volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 30 and/or cachememory 32. Computer system/server 12 may further include otherremovable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storagemedia. By way of example only, storage system 34 can be provided forreading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media(not shown and typically called a “hard drive”). Although not shown, amagnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable,non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical diskdrive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile opticaldisk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided.In such instances, each can be connected to bus 18 by one or more datamedia interfaces. As will be further depicted and described below,memory 28 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g.,at least one) of program modules that are configured to carry out thefunctions of embodiments of the invention.

Program/utility 40, having a set (at least one) of program modules 42,may be stored in memory 28 by way of example, and not limitation, aswell as an operating system, one or more application programs, otherprogram modules, and program data. Each of the operating system, one ormore application programs, other program modules, and program data orsome combination thereof, may include an implementation of a networkingenvironment. Program modules 42 generally carry out the functions and/ormethodologies of embodiments of the invention as described herein.

Computer system/server 12 may also communicate with one or more externaldevices 14 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 24, etc.;one or more devices that enable a user to interact with computersystem/server 12; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.)that enable computer system/server 12 to communicate with one or moreother computing devices. Such communication can occur via Input/Output(I/O) interfaces 22. Still yet, computer system/server 12 cancommunicate with one or more networks such as a local area network(LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g.,the Internet) via network adapter 20. As depicted, network adapter 20communicates with the other components of computer system/server 12 viabus 18. It should be understood that although not shown, other hardwareand/or software components could be used in conjunction with computersystem/server 12. Examples, include, but are not limited to: microcode,device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays,RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.

Referring now to FIG. 2, illustrative cloud computing environment 50 isdepicted. As shown, cloud computing environment 50 comprises one or morecloud computing nodes 10 with which local computing devices used bycloud consumers, such as, for example, personal digital assistant (PDA)or cellular telephone 54A, desktop computer 54B, laptop computer 54C,and/or automobile computer system 54N may communicate. Nodes 10 maycommunicate with one another. They may be grouped (not shown) physicallyor virtually, in one or more networks, such as Private, Community,Public, or Hybrid clouds as described hereinabove, or a combinationthereof. This allows cloud computing environment 50 to offerinfrastructure, platforms and/or software as services for which a cloudconsumer does not need to maintain resources on a local computingdevice. It is understood that the types of computing devices 54A-N shownin FIG. 2 are intended to be illustrative only and that computing nodes10 and cloud computing environment 50 can communicate with any type ofcomputerized device over any type of network and/or network addressableconnection (e.g., using a web browser).

Referring now to FIG. 3, a set of functional abstraction layers providedby cloud computing environment 50 (FIG. 2) is shown. It should beunderstood in advance that the components, layers, and functions shownin FIG. 3 are intended to be illustrative only and embodiments of theinvention are not limited thereto. As depicted, the following layers andcorresponding functions are provided:

Hardware and software layer 60 includes hardware and softwarecomponents. Examples of hardware components include: mainframes 61; RISC(Reduced Instruction Set Computer) architecture based servers 62;servers 63; blade servers 64; storage devices 65; and networks andnetworking components 66. In some embodiments, software componentsinclude network application server software 67 and database software 68.

Virtualization layer 70 provides an abstraction layer from which thefollowing examples of virtual entities may be provided: virtual servers71; virtual storage 72; virtual networks 73, including virtual privatenetworks; virtual applications and operating systems 74; and virtualclients 75.

In one example, management layer 80 may provide the functions describedbelow. Resource provisioning 81 provides dynamic procurement ofcomputing resources and other resources that are utilized to performtasks within the cloud computing environment. Metering and Pricing 82provide cost tracking as resources are utilized within the cloudcomputing environment, and billing or invoicing for consumption of theseresources. In one example, these resources may comprise applicationsoftware licenses. Security provides identity verification for cloudconsumers and tasks, as well as protection for data and other resources.User portal 83 provides access to the cloud computing environment forconsumers and system administrators. Service level management 84provides cloud computing resource allocation and management such thatrequired service levels are met. Service Level Agreement (SLA) planningand fulfillment 85 provide pre-arrangement for, and procurement of,cloud computing resources for which a future requirement is anticipatedin accordance with an SLA.

Workloads layer 90 provides examples of functionality for which thecloud computing environment may be utilized. Examples of workloads andfunctions which may be provided from this layer include: mapping andnavigation 91; software development and lifecycle management 92; virtualclassroom education delivery 93; data analytics processing 94;transaction processing 95; and data protection 96. As described herein,data protection 96 may include: detecting a breach (e.g., unauthorizedaccess, denial of service attack, or other malicious activity) at aproduction system; generating a new production system that includes apatch based on the detected breach; converting the breached originalproduction system to a honeypot (decoy) system with replicated low valuedata; and generating a reduced security honeypot system that includesadditional known vulnerabilities.

FIG. 4 depicts an illustrative environment for implementing the steps inaccordance with aspects of the invention. Specifically, FIG. 4 shows anetworked computing environment 400 including a production server 402, aproduction database 404, and a security system 406 all connected to anetwork 408. Each of the production server 402, the production database404, and the security system 406 may include a respective computersystem/server 12 as described with respect to FIG. 1. Further, theenvironment 400 may be a cloud computing environment in which each ofthe production server 402, the production database 404, and the securitysystem 406 are located at one or more computing nodes of the cloudcomputing environment, e.g., in a manner as described with respect toFIG. 2. The environment 400 may be a private cloud environment used byan enterprise, e.g., to conduct business functions. The elements 402,404, 406 may be at respective different nodes of the environment 400.Alternatively, two or more of the elements 402, 404, 406 may be at asame node of the environment 400.

As depicted in FIG. 4, client devices 410 a, 410 b, . . . , 410 n may beoperatively connected to the network 408 via a second network 412 suchas the Internet. The client devices 410 a-n may be conventional usercomputer devices, such as computing devices 54A-N shown in FIG. 2. Anexternal security device 414, such as a firewall and routing device, maybe interposed between the network 408 and the second network 412. Inthis manner, valid users may be provided access to the production server402 and/or production database 404 by providing authenticationcredentials to the security device 414 via one of the client devices 410a-n.

In one exemplary implementation, the production server 402 and theproduction database 404 are part of a production system 416 that isowned or operated by an enterprise. The production server 402 mayinclude an application server such as a web server, for example, and theproduction database 404 may include data associated with customers ofthe enterprise. An individual customer of the enterprise may use aclient device 410 a-n to access the production server 402 via anInternet address, at which point the customer may utilize an applicationserved by the production server 402 that accesses, changes, or otherwiseuses data contained in the production database 404. As is understood inthe art, an application server may include a computing device that hostsan application program and serves the application program to a networkedclient computing device. As is further understood in the art, a databasemay include a collection of data that is stored on a computing deviceand that is accessed through an application server. Aspects of theinvention are not limited to this exemplary implementation, and otherimplementations may be used within the scope of the invention.

In embodiments, the production database 404 stores low value data 418and high value data 420. The respective types of data that are includedin the low value data 418 and high value data 420 may be defined, forexample, by the enterprise associated with the system 416. For example,low value data 418 may be data that is relatively less sensitive to abreach by an unauthorized user of the system 416, and high value data420 may be data that is relatively more sensitive to a breach by anunauthorized user of the system 416. In a cloud-based system the systemdata may be tagged with its respective sensitivity, which can be laterused by the honeypot generation system.

Still referring to FIG. 4, according to aspects of the invention, thesecurity system 406 includes a threat detection module 442 a, aprovisioning module 442 b, and a monitoring module 442 c that correspondto program modules 42 as described with respect to FIG. 1. Inembodiments, the threat detection module 442 a is configured to detect abreach of the system 416 by a client device (e.g., client device 410a-n). The threat detection module 442 a may use security and/or forensicsoftware to collect and/or analyze data associated with actions ofclient device 410 a-n that are directed at the system 416, such as aclient device 410 a-n accessing, probing, or scanning the system 416.For example, the threat detection module 442 a may use securityinformation and event management (SIEM) software to detect a breach ofthe system 416.

As described herein, a breach may include unauthorized access of anelement of the system 416, an attack on the system 416 such as a denialof service attack, or other malicious activity that targets the system416. The data collected by the threat detection module 442 a may be usedin an automated or semi-automated manner to flag certain behavior as abreach and to determine a vulnerability of the system 416 that permittedthe breach. For example, a human user, such as an IT security analyst,may use the data obtained by the threat detection module 442 a toperform a forensic analysis of actions taken at the system 416 for thepurpose of identifying a breach and the vulnerability that permitted thebreach. In another example, the threat detection module 442 a mayautomatically detect and indicate a breach based on the collected datasatisfying one or more predefined conditions that define a breach.Implementations of the invention are not limited to these techniques fordetecting a breach, and any suitable techniques (conventional or laterdeveloped) may be utilized by the threat detection module 442 a.

Referring now to FIGS. 4 and 5, according to aspects of the invention,the provisioning module 442 b is configured to cause the performance ofresponsive actions in the environment 400 based on a breach of thesystem 416 being detected using the threat detection module 442 a. Inembodiments, the actions include: generating a new production system 500that includes a patch for the detected breach; converting the breachedoriginal production system 416 to a honeypot (decoy) system 416′ withreplicated low value data selected based on the data classification; andgenerating a reduced security honeypot system 600 that includes knownvulnerabilities.

As shown in FIG. 5, in embodiments, generating a new production system500 includes provisioning a new production server 502 and a newproduction database 504 in the environment 400. Each of the newproduction server 502 and new production database 504 may include acomputer system/server in the environment 400, and may be configured toperform the same business function(s) as the production server 402 andproduction database 404. For example, the new production server 502 maybe configured to serve the same application(s) as production server 402,and the new production database 504 may be provided with the same dataas the production database 404, including the low value data 418 and thehigh value data 420. The provisioning of the new production system 500may be performed in an automated or semi-automated manner usingconventional techniques. For example, in a semi-automatedimplementation, one or more scripts of the provisioning module 442 b mayprompt a user to provide input relating to user-selected features of thenew production system 500, and the provisioning module 442 b may thenautomatically generate the new production system 500 based on the inputprovided by the user. In an automated implementation, the provisioningmodule 442 b may generate exact copies of the production server and theproduction database within the environment 400 without any input from auser.

Additionally, the new production system 500 includes a patch or otherconfiguration change installed on at least one of the new productionserver 502 and the new production database 504. As is understood in theart, a patch is a piece of software designed to update a computerprogram or supporting data to fix a security vulnerability. As but oneexample, when a vulnerability is detected and determined as being due toa backlevel system library, a patch may involve apply manual orautomatic (e.g., using an endpoint solution) patching on the affectedmachines. In implementations of the invention, the patch is created tofix (e.g., eliminate) the security vulnerability that permitted thebreach of the system 416. The patch may be created in a conventionalmanner, e.g., by a user such as a software developer and/or IT securityanalyst. The patch is included in the new production server 502 and/orthe new production database 504 when the new production system 500 isgenerated. Upon generating the new production system 500, the validusers that access the environment 400 are routed to the new productionsystem 500 instead of the breached production system 416.

With continued reference to FIG. 5, the breached original productionsystem 416 is converted to a honeypot (decoy) system 416′. Inembodiments, the production server 402 and the production database 404are left intact in the environment 400, and the data in the productiondatabase 404 is modified by removing sensitive data. For example, thehigh value data 420 may be deleted from the production database 404 andthe low value data 418 may be left in the production database 404. Inembodiments, the high value data 420 is replaced in the productiondatabase 404 with decoy high value data 420′ that is generated based onthe low value data 418. For example, for an encrypted file where thesystem has the capability to decrypt file contents, the data contentscan be replaced with a low value file and the data re-encrypted so thatthe data appears superficially identical to the source data. Likewiselow value data can be scrambled, carved up and otherwise transformed togive the appearance of more sensitive or protected data. In this manner,the breached original production system 416 is converted to a honeypotsystem 416′ with the goal of keeping the attacker occupied in a honeypotand, thus, diverting the attacker's resources away from the newproduction system 500.

Still referring to FIG. 5, in accordance with aspects of the invention,a reduced security (i.e., weak) honeypot system 600 is generated in theenvironment 400. In embodiments, generating the reduced securityhoneypot system 600 includes provisioning a new honeypot server 602 anda new honeypot database 604 in the environment 400. Each of the honeypotserver 602 and honeypot database 604 may include a computersystem/server in the environment 400, and may be configured to performthe same business function(s) as the production server 402 andproduction database 404. For example, the honeypot server 602 may beconfigured to serve the same application(s) as production server 402.

In embodiments, the honeypot database 604 contains data 618 that mayinclude one or more of: the low value data 418; a modified (e.g.,scrambled) version of the low value data 418; the decoy high value data420′; and data that is not based on the data from the productiondatabase 404 (i.e., data from another source). In a preferredembodiment, the honeypot database 604 does not contain the high valuedata 420 since the honeypot database 604 has intentionally reducedsecurity.

According to aspects of the invention, the reduced security honeypotsystem 600 illustrated in FIG. 5 is generated to include thevulnerability that led to the detected breach of system 416. As such,the reduced security honeypot system 600 does not include the patch thatis applied to the new production system 500. An attacker that probes theenvironment 400 for the same vulnerability that led to the breach of thesystem 416 may detect the vulnerability in the reduced security honeypotsystem 600 and subsequently expend resources attacking the reducedsecurity honeypot system 600. In this manner, implementations of theinvention lure an attacker into attacking the reduced security honeypotsystem 600.

According to aspects of the invention, the reduced security honeypotsystem 600 illustrated in FIG. 5 is also generated with additionalpredetermined security vulnerabilities. For example, the softwareprograms (e.g., operating systems, applications, etc.) installed on thehoneypot server 602 and/or the honeypot database 604 may be old versionsof the programs that have known vulnerabilities to known attacks (e.g.,Shellshock, Heartbleed, etc.). An attacker that probes the environment400 for the known vulnerabilities may detect such a vulnerability in thereduced security honeypot system 600 and subsequently expend resourcesattacking the reduced security honeypot system 600. Additionally, otherattackers that happen upon honeypot system 600 will find other knownvulnerabilities can be used to attack the system. In this manner,implementations of the invention lure attackers into attacking thereduced security honeypot system 600.

The reduced security honeypot system 600 may be automatically generatedwith the additional predetermined security vulnerabilities. In oneexample, the reduced security honeypot system 600 is deployed using ahistorical snapshot of the system 416. Since system libraries andapplications get patched over time, an older version of the system 416will contain known exploits. For example, if an administrator patchedOpenSSL in May 2014, a system snapshot from October 2013 would containthe Heartbleed vulnerability. Archived snapshots can be further combinedwith system maintenance and application defect records to identifyspecific differences between the old and new systems, which provides aspecific list of known vulnerabilities being injected into the reducedsecurity honeypot system 600 by using a historical snapshot.

In another example, the reduced security honeypot system 600 is deployedusing a current snapshot of the system, but then rolling back specificlibraries with known exploits. For example, the OpenSSL library can berolled back or lowered to a prior (e.g., older) version known to bevulnerable to Heartbleed, and the bash library can be rolled back orlowered to a prior (e.g., older) version known to be vulnerable toShellshock. Patched vulnerability information for open source librariesis available publicly and can provide a list of vulnerabilities beinginjected. Alternatively the system may be configured to maintain a listof widely exploited libraries and bugs (as in the case of customapplication) for use as a reference to know which vulnerabilities arebeing injected into the system.

Using either method (i.e., a historical snapshot or a current snapshotwith a rollback), the system may be configured to additionally catalogthe injected vulnerabilities and reference them against the exploitsknown to be used against the weak honeypots. These exploits can then becategorized as “not interesting” by security devices or manual analysis.For example, customers running STEM software in the reduced securityhoneypot system 600 may configure the SIEM software to have a “low”severity for the Heartbleed and Shellshock attack activity, or thesystem may be configured to automatically configure the SIEM software toignore the injected exploits.

Using either method (i.e., a historical snapshot or a current snapshotwith a rollback), the number of vulnerabilities to inject may be aconfigurable option. An administrator may provide this detail, or thesystem may make an estimate based on the number of vulnerabilities thatshould be injected and the severity of known exploits.

Still referring to FIG. 5, in accordance with aspects of the invention,the monitoring module 442 c monitors an attacker's actions in thereduced security honeypot system 600 to detect evidence of a new breachbased on a previously unknown vulnerability of the production system.For example, the monitoring module 442 c may employ SIEM software todetect and collect data on a zero-day attack by an attacker in thereduced security honeypot system 600. A user, such as an IT securityspecialist, a developer, etc., may analyze the data associated with thezero-day attack on the reduced security honeypot system 600 and developa patch for the new production system 500 that hardens the newproduction system 500 against the detected zero-day attack. In thismanner, implementations of the invention provide a mechanism foridentifying which attacks an attacker will try to use. For attacks thathave not yet been targeted at the new production system 500, the attackscan be monitored and analyzed such that vulnerabilities can beproactively mitigated on the new production system 500.

FIG. 6 shows an exemplary flow for performing aspects of the presentinvention. The steps of FIG. 6 may be implemented in the environments ofFIGS. 1-5, for example. As noted above, the flowchart(s) illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 6 depicts an exemplary flow for a process in accordance withaspects of the present invention. At step 702, a breach is detected in anetworked computing environment. In embodiments, the networked computingenvironment includes a production system such as system 416 including aproduction server 402 and a production database 404 described withrespect to FIG. 4. The breach may be, for example, an unauthorizedaccess, attack, or other malicious activity at one of the elements ofthe production system. The breach may be detected using a computersystem (such as security system 406 executing a threat detection module442 a) that communicates with one or more elements of the networkedcomputing environment.

At step 704, a new production system is generated based on the detectingthe breach. In embodiments, a computer system (such as security system406 executing a provisioning module 442 b) generates the new productionsystem in the manner described with respect to new production system 500of FIG. 5. For example, the new production system may include a newproduction server and a new production database provisioned in thenetworked computing environment. The new production server and databasemay be substantially the same as the original production server anddatabase prior to the breach, with the exceptions that the newproduction server and database are physically and/or logically separatefrom the original production server and database, and at least one ofthe new production server and database is patched to eliminate thevulnerability that permitted the breach that was detected at step 702.

At step 706, valid users of the production system are routed to the newproduction system instead of the breached original production system.For example, as described in FIG. 5, an external security and routingdevice may receive a request and authentication credentials from aclient computing device (e.g., client device 410 a), and route the userto the new production system.

At step 708, the breached original production system is converted to adecoy system. In embodiments, a computer system (such as the securitysystem 406 executing the provisioning module 442 b) converts thebreached original production system to a decoy system in the mannerdescribed with respect to honeypot system 416′ of FIG. 5. For example,the production database of the breached original production system ismodified by removing sensitive data. The production database of thebreached original production system may be further modified by addingnew data, such as decoy high value data.

At step 710, a reduced security system is generated in the networkedcomputing environment. In embodiments, a computer system (such as thesecurity system 406 executing the provisioning module 442 b) generatesthe reduced security system in the manner described with respect toreduced security honeypot system 600 of FIG. 5. In embodiments, thereduced security system is provisioned in a manner to include thevulnerability that permitted the breach of step 702. In additionalembodiments, the reduced security system is provisioned in a manner toinclude additional known vulnerabilities.

At step 712, the reduced security system is monitored to detect newattacks. When a new attack is detected at step 712, then at step 714 apatch is generated and applied to the new production system. Steps 712and 714 may be accomplished in the manner described with respect to FIG.5. For example, a computer system (such as the security system 406executing the monitoring module 442 c) monitors the reduced securitysystem for new attacks. Based on data collected by the computer system,a new attack (e.g., a zero-day attack) may be detected and analyzed, anda patch that eliminates a vulnerability exposed by the new attack may bedeveloped and applied to the new production system. In this manner,monitoring a decoy system can be used to develop a patch for aproduction system.

In still another embodiment, the invention provides acomputer-implemented method for data protection on a network. In thiscase, a computer infrastructure, such as computer system 12 (FIG. 1),can be provided and one or more systems for performing the processes ofthe invention can be obtained (e.g., created, purchased, used, modified,etc.) and deployed to the computer infrastructure. To this extent, thedeployment of a system can comprise one or more of: (1) installingprogram code on a computing device, such as computer system 12 (as shownin FIG. 1), from a computer-readable medium; (2) adding one or morecomputing devices to the computer infrastructure; and (3) incorporatingand/or modifying one or more existing systems of the computerinfrastructure to enable the computer infrastructure to perform theprocesses of the invention.

The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present inventionhave been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intendedto be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Manymodifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skillin the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the describedembodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain theprinciples of the embodiments, the practical application or technicalimprovement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodimentsdisclosed herein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of providing data protection in anetworked computing environment, comprising: detecting, by at least onecomputer device, a breach of a first system in the networked computingenvironment; in response to the detecting of the breach of the firstsystem, generating, by the at least one computer device, a second systemin the networked computing environment, wherein the second systemincludes a patch that eliminates a vulnerability exposed by the breach;and converting, by the at least one computer device, the first system toa decoy system, wherein the first system and the second system arelogically separate, and wherein the converting the first system to thedecoy system comprises: deleting high value data from a database of thefirst system; and leaving low value data in the database of the firstsystem.
 2. A method of providing data protection in a networkedcomputing environment, comprising: detecting, by at least one computerdevice, a breach of a first system in the networked computingenvironment; in response to the detecting of the breach of the firstsystem, generating, by the at least one computer device, a second systemin the networked computing environment, wherein the second systemincludes a patch based on the breach; and converting, by the at leastone computer device, the first system to a decoy system, wherein thefirst system and the second system are logically separate, wherein theconverting the first system to the decoy system comprises: deleting highvalue data from a database of the first system; and leaving low valuedata in the database of the first system, and wherein the generating thesecond system comprises: determining a vulnerability that permitted thebreach; creating the patch to eliminate the vulnerability; provisioninga new production server and a new production database in the networkedcomputing environment; and applying the patch to at least one of the newproduction server and the new production database.
 3. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising: routing a client request for a service tothe first system prior to the generating the second system; and routinga client request for the service to the second system after thegenerating the second system.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein: thefirst system and the second system are physically separate; and thefirst system in the networked computer environment comprises a firstserver and a first database and the second system in the networkedcomputer environment comprises a second server and a second database. 5.The method of claim 1, wherein the converting the first system to thedecoy system comprises generating and adding decoy high value data tothe database of the first system.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein aservice provider at least one of creates, maintains, deploys andsupports the at least one computer device.
 7. The method of claim 1,wherein the detecting the breach, the generating the second system, andthe converting the first system are provided by a service provider on asubscription, advertising, and/or fee basis.
 8. The method of claim 1,wherein the detecting the breach, the generating the second system, andthe converting the first system are provided by software as a service ina cloud environment.
 9. A computer program product for providing dataprotection in a networked computing environment, the computer programproduct comprising a computer readable storage device having programinstructions embodied therewith, the program instructions beingexecutable by a computer device to cause the computer device to: detecta breach of a first production system in the networked computingenvironment; in response to the detecting the breach of the firstproduction system, generate a second production system in the networkedcomputing environment, wherein the second production system includes apatch that eliminates a vulnerability exposed by the breach; and convertthe first production system to a decoy system by: removing high valuedata from a database in the first production system; generating decoyhigh value data based on low value data contained in the database; andstoring the decoy high value data in the database, wherein the firstproduction system and the second production system are logicallyseparate.
 10. The computer program product of claim 9, wherein thegenerating the second system comprises: determining a vulnerability thatpermitted the breach; creating the patch to eliminate the vulnerability;provisioning a new production server and a new production database inthe networked computing environment; and applying the patch to at leastone of the new production server and the new production database. 11.The computer program product of claim 9, the program instructionsfurther being executable by the computer device to cause the computerdevice to: route a client request for a service to the first systemprior to the generating the second system; and route a client requestfor the service to the second system after the generating the secondsystem.
 12. The computer program product of claim 9, wherein: the firstsystem and the second system are physically separate; and the firstsystem in the networked computer environment comprises a first serverand a first database and the second system in the networked computerenvironment comprises a second server and a second database.
 13. Thecomputer program product of claim 9, wherein the converting the firstsystem to the decoy system comprises generating and adding decoy highvalue data to the database of the first system.
 14. The computer programproduct of claim 9, wherein a service provider at least one of creates,maintains, deploys and supports the at least one computer device. 15.The computer program product of claim 9, wherein the detecting thebreach, the generating the second system, and the converting the firstsystem are provided by a service provider on a subscription,advertising, and/or fee basis.
 16. The computer program product of claim9, wherein the detecting the breach, the generating the second system,and the converting the first system are provided by software as aservice in a cloud environment.
 17. The method of claim 1, wherein thepatch is a configuration update to mitigate the breach.
 18. The methodof claim 17, wherein the configuration update is applied to a databaseof the second system.